Friday, July 14, 2017

The Rube Show, As Presented By The Carnival Barker Predisent

"I am Marc Kasowitz, Predisent Trump's personal lawyer", the 45th illegitimate sexual-assaulter-in-chief's very own ambulance chaser wrote following ex-FBI directer James Comey's testimony on 6/8/2017 (misspelling "president").

The gist of Kasowitz's written statement was that Comey is a liar and the Trumpster never asked Comey for loyalty. Trump also denied he asked Comey to drop the investigation into Flynn's lawbreaking. Although he insisted it would have been OK if he had.

Just like he never told Flynn to talk to the Russians - although it would have been OK if he had. How dumb does Trump think we are? Correction - Trump KNOWS his followers are dumb ("I love the poorly educated"). The rest of us know he's LYING!

And how stupid is it to run an entire administration with a primary goal of keeping things going by lying to the hardcore base and NOT CARING that everyone else knows you're lying about so many things! The Trump administration is what you'd expect from an ex-reality Teevee star. One who is OBVIOUSLY still practicing his craft! That craft being pulling the wool over the eyes of gullible rubes.

Last month, President Trump visited Saudi Arabia and his administration announced that he had concluded a $110 billion arms deal with the kingdom. Only problem is that there is no deal. ... There is no $110 billion deal. Instead, there are a bunch of letters of interest or intent, but not contracts. Many are offers that the defense industry thinks the Saudis will be interested in someday. So far nothing has been notified to the Senate for review. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency, the arms sales wing of the Pentagon, calls them "intended sales". None of the deals identified so far are new, all began in the Obama administration. (The $110 billion arms deal to Saudi Arabia is fake news by Bruce Riedel. Brookings 6/5/2017.).

Here is a picture of Trump and a Saudi ally signing the non-deal.

Remember that Saudi Arabia is the country that supplied most of the 9/11 hijackers and that Saudi Arabia sponsors terror. But Trump (displaying his cowardice) didn't discuss "radical Islam" while there, instead calling Islam "one of the world's great faiths". This despite the fact that he previously stated "I think Islam hates us". Remember that Trump's travel ban was made to play to his base's fear (there is no purpose for it except to fulfill a campaign promise made because the stupid and hateful rubes want it).

But yet this fake deal garners little-to-no outrage. Instead the Orange One's Press Secretary (Spicer) sez the trip "was a historic turning point that people will be talking about for many years to come". What a bunch of over-the-top laughably ridiculous bullplop. But it's JUST the kind of bullplop that the rubes love, apparently.

Another recent Trump lie concerns his desire to bigly cut taxes on wealthy people like himself (the one he issued a one page outline regarding). On 6/1/2017 Trump said "Our tax bill is moving along in Congress, and I believe it's doing very well. I think a lot of people will be very pleasantly surprised". This despite the fact that (so far) there is no bill.

It does not exist. They haven't begun writing it. All they know is that they want to cut taxes bigley to the benefit of (primarily) the wealthy. And cut programs that benefit working people. That being their primary objective (TrumpCare being more of a tax cut bill than a health care bill).

Trump, I believe, knows he is lying. At least as far as these fake accomplishments go. But he simply does not care. Maybe he thinks that (if he has people believing things are happening before they actually do) that it will make it easier to accomplish them? Positive group-thinking will move the ball forward faster than if the Rubes are aware of the actual difficulties? Perhaps (although I'm convinced that feeding his enormous ego is also a significant factor). But that does not change the fact that it's a con.

A show for the Rubes to fool them into thinking the Trump presidency is going fantastically. Even though Trump's bogus accomplishments are fake news. But that might not be a bad thing. If only the most radicalized and deluded of the Orange carnival barker's base continue to believe his lies (no matter what), other Trump voters should eventually wake up to the fact that he's failing to deliver when it comes to his campaign promises (weakened Muslim ban, no Wall, no repeal and replace of ObamaCare with "something fantastic", etc).

And, if he isn't actually #MAGA, but only putting on a show, then the damage done by this for-the-rich/by-the-rich administration and Congress will be minimized. Hopefully.

On the other hand, the mean and idiotic TrumpCare legislation won't die. It still has a chance of being passed, in fact. And taking away healthcare insurance from many Trump supporters. Will they finally get that they've been lied to if that happens?

BTW, that TrumpCare is MEAN was not a criticism by the preznit of the GOP legislation that will result in 23 million losing their insurance, but a compliment. This I know because he has also suggested that, if TrumpCare cannot be passed, that 32 million people should lose their insurance (what would happen if ObamaCare were repealed and replaced with nothing. Which the preznit has suggested doing).

Video: Neal Brennan's take [appearing on the 7/12/2017 airing of The Daily Show] re Trump and Congressional Republicans accomplishing none/very little of their agenda is that the are "resisting" themselves.

SWTD #382

Saturday, June 10, 2017

Thoughts On The Patriot Reality Winner, The Seth Rich Murder Conspiracy Theory, The Asshole Julian Assange & The Inevitable Trump Impeachment

Nance's Law of Intelligence Kismet: Coincidence Takes a Lot of Planning! ~ Malcolm Nance via Twitter, 4/1/2017.

First, is Reality Winner a cool name or what? Unfortunately for Ms. Winner it looks like she is going to prison for several years. She appears to be another Edward Snowden, except on a lesser scale. In that she leaked far fewer documents and also did not flee. But she might not have been expecting to get caught.

Which she might not have been, except that the Intercept (Glenn Greenwald news organization) gave her up. According to what I've read, they turned over the document she sent them, and from that the authorities were able to determine that she physically printed it out and mailed it to the Intercept. The authorities, upon further examining the document, determined the serial number of the printer it was generated using.

Because "recent model color printers automatically leave a unique stamp on the documents they produce". Which made it easy to determine it was her. Seems to me that the Intercept did a crappy job of protecting its source.

One thing going on post revelation of Winner as the leaker is Julian Assange (dick who assisted Putin because of their mutual hate for Hillary Clinton) saying Reality "must be supported". Concerning Winner, Assange tweeted "she is a young woman accused of courage in trying to help us know". WTF is he talking about? According to Assange, it was Seth Rich who gave them the documents and Russia was not involved!

On Dutch television in August 2016, Assange hinted that Rich, not Russia, may have been the source for the WikiLeaks emails. "Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material, and often very significant risks", he said. "As a 27-year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington" [knows].

"Was he [Seth Rich] one of your sources then?" the anchor asked. "We don't comment on who our sources are", Assange replied. "Then why make the suggestion about a young guy being shot in the streets of Washington?" the anchor replied. Pressed repeatedly for clarification, Assange concluded that "others, others have suggested that". (The bonkers Seth Rich conspiracy theory, explained by Jeff Guo. Vox 5/24/2017).

"Others" have suggested that?! YOU just suggested it was Seth Rich! If you think describing someone without using their name - while leaving absolutely no doubt whatsoever who it is you're talking about - is "suggesting". Which I absolutely do. What an asshole. To suggest that Seth Rich was the source of the documents (thus fueling conspiracy theory nuts like Willis Hart) when he knows the documents did not come from Rich.

"He was so upset", a person who was very close to Rich said on the condition of anonymity for fear of being targeted by cyberbullies and conspiracy theorists. "It was crazy. Especially for Seth. He said, 'Oh, my God. We have a foreign entity trying to get involved in our elections?' That made him so angry". (Seth Rich wasn't just another D.C. murder victim. He was a meme in the weirdest presidential election of our times by Manuel Roig-Franzia. The Washington Post 1/18/2017).

Maybe Seth Rich was actually not "so upset" but "so relieved" that the DNC was blaming Russia for the theft of it's data instead of him? Or maybe this "person who was very close" to Rich is make-believe, as the Donald tweeted on 5/28/2017 (Whenever you see the words 'sources say' in the fake news media, and they don't mention names... it is very possible that those sources don't exist but are made up by fake news writers).

Either many of the our largest news organizations (excepting Fox) plus all our intelligence agencies are lying, or there IS something to the "Trump Russia narrative". If not it must be a complete coincidence that so many of Trump's campaign operatives had contacts with Russia prior to his taking office - and they all "forgot" to mention those contacts in their security clearance paperwork.

Me, I think it's much more likely that "coordination may have taken place... between Trump campaign associates and suspected Russian operatives" (US officials: Info suggests Trump associates may have coordinated with Russians) and that it's only a matter of time before Special counsel Robert Mueller's team uncovers impeachable offences.

Especially given that "Mueller is expected to take an expansive view of his role". It's like when Bill Clinton was investigated for Whitewater and (eventually) impeached for a BJ (lying about consensual sex with an intern). If Mueller is casting a wide net I will be shocked if nothing is uncovered. Unless Trump (or Congressional Republicans) stop Muller, I except Trump will be impeached for coordination with Russia. Or maybe it will be for money laundering. Or maybe for something else.

Anyway, while the document leaked by Reality Winner adds to our understanding of the bigger picture, it obviously will not significant when it comes to Trump's (hopeful) inevitable downfall. So, while I agree with her that his is a "soulless ginger orangutan", I do wonder why she'd throw away her life when the odds of Trump going down are (with or without the document) at least in the moderate range.

I'm not counting any chickens before they hatch, but Malcolm Nance says "Trump's got a million things to be impeached on". Impeachment might not be inevitable, especially if Democrats don't take back at least one of the Houses of Congress in 2018.

Or Trump's offenses and crimes might become so obvious that Republicans decide they are better off with Pence. Me, I'm hoping that Trump ends up humiliated and broken and that a weakened Republican Party cannot accomplish anything in however long they have left with complete power. And then a Democratic majority (presidency and Congress) is elected in 2020 (a Progressive Democrat as President would be awesome).

If not we are likely totally f*cked. Given that Paul Ryan (God forbid he ends up president) wants to finish the transformation of the US into a plutocracy. Whatever happens I think we're going to have to go through some rough shit before there is any hope of seeing light at the other end.

800×734

SWTD #381

Saturday, May 27, 2017

I Want Donald J. Trump Dead. Either By Natural Causes Or Assassination. Whatever It Takes To Remove Him From The Presidency

Obama, he's a piece of shit. I told him to suck on my machine gun ~ Ted Nugent (dob 12/13/1948) quote from a "a vicious onstage rant" during an August 2007 concert.

Just so you know, the post title is intentionally hyperbolic. I'd be OK with any method by which DJT was removed from office. Resignation, impeachment or removal via the 25th amendment would be preferable. I'd even be OK with him returning to his lavish lifestyle. Afterwhich he might divorce Melania and marry a 4th trophy wife.

It would make me extremely happy if he exited the presidency humiliated and (somehow) financially ruined. Or better yet, tried and sent to prison. Due to him violating the Logan act, being a traitor by colluding with Russia, obstructing justice, or in regards to past or ongoing criminal activity.

Point is, I am not wishing him death. Or calling for his death. Death would, in fact be the last thing I'd like to see in DJT's immediate future. I'd MUCH rather see him humiliated and ruined. Even if he does not end up in prison. Which is unlikely for many reason (a pardon from a president Pence being one). But, given the fact that it will be up to Republicans to initiate removal under the Constitution (and they might be completely unwilling no matter what), I'm OK with him being removed via death.

I mean, we know know that Republicans were aware of the Trump/Putin connection prior to the election! "House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told fellow Republicans in a private meeting last year that he thinks Russian President Vladimir Putin pays Donald Trump"... as per audio tape and the Washington Post. Although McCarthey says it was a "joke". Sure.

So the chances of Republicans getting behind impeachment might be slim. Which is why I would be OK with getting Trump out of office by either assassination or a "natural causes" croaking. Surely I would not cry. According to the troll Luke/Steve (suggested on WYD in a deleted thread) I should be the one to take out Trump. Because I am "a sad, useless person who could be sacrificed for the cause". I pointed out to him that threatening the President of the United States is a class E felony (although that didn't stop Ted Nugent, who recently visited the White House).

But it is NOT going to be me. I do not believe I could outsmart the Secret Service. Even if I were willing to sacrifice myself to get rid of Trump. I would likely fail. That's IF I had a desire or ability to try. Which I DO NOT. Although it might be better that a White guy (which I am) did it. As opposed to a Muslim or Mexican. That might result in Trump's travel ban being permanent or his wall being built. By president Pence, perhaps.

In regards to assassination, a commenter on Quora says "if past is prologue, about 1 in 4 that he will be killed, injured or narrowly escape an assassination attempt. There is a 90% chance that at least one attempt will be made, since one attempt has been made on 9 of the last 10 Presidents".

But even if an attempt is made, it does not mean it will be successful. Death by natural causes might actually be the best resolution that can be hoped for. If collusion with Russia leads to impeachment and removal from office - you KNOW his supporters will never accept it. No matter the proof uncovered, it will be "fake news" as far as they are concerned.

Death by natural cause could raise concerns of foul play. Remember that Justice Scalia was "murdered"? But the nuts will believe what they want to believe. Trump's doctor Harold Bornstein claimed that Trump would be (if elected) the "healthiest president in history". Obvious bullplop.

A blog post from The Hill says "depending on what medical records are considered, the president is either overweight or obese. Weighing in at 236 pounds, he is the third heaviest president, behind William Howard Taft and Grover Cleveland. Trump is not a believer in exercise and his diet is considered less than healthy, by many experts".

CNN Politics reports that "other than golf, he considers exercise misguided, arguing that a person, like a battery, is born with a finite amount of energy". Apparently Trump believes "the human body is like a battery, with a finite amount of energy, which exercise only depletes". Of course people who aren't weirdos know this theory is idiotic.

Trump is the oldest person to ever become president. Ronald Reagan was 69 at beginning of his first term. Trump was 70 upon inauguration. Many people believe he suffers from dementia. I agree that dementia could be an explanation. Raw Story believes "Trump's speech deterioration could be a sign of early dementia".

Although, the man who authored The Art of the Deal, Tony Schwartz, says "Trump has a 200-word vocabulary". This is an assessment Schwartz reached after working with the Donald (preparation to ghostwrite his book) in 1987 (30 years ago).

A Trump presidency is a danger to the world and he MUST go. Which is why I'm OK with whatever it takes to remove him from office. Excepting any method that changes us from a democracy to some other form of government (a military coup, for example). Also, I would not want Madonna to blow up the White House (a lot of innocent people would die). Other than that? Whatever it takes. The incompetent Orange Buffoon has GOT to go. The sooner the better.

BTW, as much as I hated gwb (and I hated him a LOT), I never entertained such thoughts for a sustained period of time (assassination or death by natural causes). I thought he should be impeached for lying us into 2 illegal wars, but I did not seriously think it would happen. Unlike with Trump. Impeachment looks like a real possibility. Trump is clearly way in over his head. He is the most unqualified person EVER to assume the presidency.

Anyway, I am not calling for, or hoping that Trump be assassinated. I'm only saying that I wouldn't give a shit if he were. Unlike Trump, who did suggest that Hillary should be assassinated if she were to win. If gwb had been assassinated I would have agreed that it was a national tragedy (a president, any president being murdered). As opposed to possibly a good thing in the case of Trump.

Video: Insane man (or actor playing a character) Alex Jones says the CIA & Obama are plotting the assassination of Trump, 12/11/2016 (2:50).

SWTD #380

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Tuesday Afternoon Massacre (Countdown To Trump Impeachment)

If no special prosecutor is appointed, everyone is going to suspect coverup ~ Chuck Schumer on the firing of Comey.

America's reality show preznit Donald Trump to James Comey: "you're fired". John Podesta (HRC's campaign manager) via tweet following the firing: "didn't you know you're supposed to wait til Saturday night to massacre people investigating you?".

The "Saturday Night Massacre" was one of the most dramatic turns of events in the Watergate scandal - the political drama that rocked the United States in the 1970s and led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon. President Nixon and the Attorney General's office were locked in a political standoff over Nixon's refusal to comply with orders to release recordings of White House conversations. Nixon ordered the firing of Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox. But Attorney General Elliot Richardson and his deputy William Ruckelshaus resigned rather than comply with the order. Cox was eventually fired by the US solicitor general.

Critics of President Trump's firing of FBI director James Comey see similarities between Cox's firing decades ago and Trump's action on Tuesday. The Trump administration, critics say, is trying to undermine the FBI's investigation into allegations of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, just as Nixon tried to stop lawmakers from learning the truth about his role in the Watergate scandal. (Comey firing draws comparisons to Nixon's "Saturday Night Massacre" by Joe Sterling. CNN, 5/10/2017).

So, are we going to get a special prosecutor now and will investigations into Trump lead to his resignation or impeachment? BTW, Trump cited Jeff Sessions as recommending the firing. Huh. I thought Sessions said he'd recuse himself in regards to the Trump/Russia investigation (due to his being caught lying to Senator Franken about his own Russia connections). Then he tells Trump to fire the head guy investigating his campaign?

"While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation" Trump's letter to Comey informing him of the firing reads - a claim that is complete BS. According to The Washington Post, "speaking to reporters Tuesday evening, [White House Press Secretary] Spicer said he did not know what the three occasions were when Comey told Trump that he wasn't under investigation". That's because it never happened.

BTW, according to Fox Nooz, Comey "resigned". Malcolm Nance (on the 5/10/2017 of the Stephanie Miller Show) said 2 names being floated as Comey replacements include Rudy Giuliani (who has also been linked to Russia) and Sheriff Clarke (RW hero who allowed a prisoner to be murdered by guards in his jail).

Two individuals who will be certain to pick up shut down the Trump/Russia investigation. Time for a special prosecutor.

1200×727

See also: [RNUSA] Trump Fires Comey [5/9/2017]. RN writes "Are Trump's true motives obvious on this? or is it just me?"... No it is not just you. As per the Washington Post "Trump has given every reason for us to believe he fired Comey over the Russia investigation". BTW, as per the former MI6 agent Christopher Steele dossier, there exists "records of payments from the Trump campaign to banks of Russian cyber trolls tasked with spreading disinformation ahead of the 2016 election".

5/16/2017 Update: From the NYT... "President Trump asked the FBI director, James B. Comey, to shut down the federal investigation into Mr. Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, in an Oval Office meeting in February, according to a memo Mr. Comey wrote shortly after the meeting. I hope you can let this go, the president told Mr. Comey, according to the memo". Comey didn't let it go and got fired. Isn't this obstruction of justice and an impeachable offense? Time for Congressional Democrats to shut down Congress until we get a special prosecutor, IMO.

5/19/2017 Update: Trump to Russian officials, admitting (again) obstruction of justice: "I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job. I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off".

#TrumpRussiaCollusion, #TrumpRussia, #ImpeachTrump.

SWTD #379

Tuesday, May 09, 2017

Luke's Truths

Luke Spencer is a mentally ill hate-filled individual who has been trolling this blog (using various IDs) for several years. A fact I have extensively documented here. Although he denies that he sent me many graphic and disgusting homophobic comments as "Steve".

"I have nothing to say about comments NOT made by me" he wrote. Even though the Blogger ID numbers (for "Luke" and "Steve" comments) are an exact match. Proof positive that he changed the name on his account from "Steve" to "Luke". Still he thinks this is something he can deny. Likely because he is an idiot.

Anyway, he has a post on his blog titled Dervish's Truths. A post he thinks reveals what a insane liar I am. Due to the post titles; many of which I chose just to provoke him. The case with a title in which I refer to Trump as the Antichrist. Something I have never declaratively stated, as such a thing is unknowable. Certainly at this point in time.

Which I point out in the post body. I say that I think that IF there is to be an Antichrist, it MIGHT be Donald Trump. But the idiot continues to claim that I have unequivocally stated that I know (or think I know) that Trump is a figure of evil that will falsely claim to be the Messiah.

Also, the moron cannot recognize satire. Or distinguish fact from fiction. So he put together (and has been updating) a commentary on his blog in which he lists my post titles. Or "truths", which he falsely claims the titles represent. Which they do not.

Anyway, what follows is my compilation of post titles from Luke's blogs. Titles that prove that Luke is the one who exhibits psychopathic and criminal behavior. Or so I'll just say. It will be more true than him saying the same thing about me, I think.

Luke's Truths: Selected Posts from Luke's Blogs

[1] Presidential Health. 9/15/2016. Luke rants about "crazy Liberals" who question whether or not Trump is physically fit enough to be president. He writes "I'm rooting for Trump, if for no other reason than to shove it down the throats of these mean, hate filled, crazy liberals who think attacking with hate is the only way to win an election".

[2] I'm Still Rooting For Trump. 2/11/2017. Luke rants about how he is still rooting for Trump because he knows how much Liberals hate Trump and he wants them to suffer.

[3] Homos! 3/4/2017. Luke rants about how much he hates gay people, including his delusion that I and another blogger he hates are gay lovers.

[4] I Am An Awesomely Fantastic, Incredibly, Colossally Stupendous Writer. Big League. 4/15/2017. Luke rants about what a great writer he is. Proof that he suffers from grandiose delusions.

[5] Dervish Sanders (A Mentally Deranged Hate-Filled Criminal) Wants To Kill Me. 5/6/2017. Luke rants about his persecutory delusion that I want to kill him. When the exact opposite it true and it is Luke who wishes me death. The proof being the many comments Luke has written saying I should kill myself.

Luke is one of the leaders of the nutjob crowd. Along with TOM, Steve, The Real Luke, and other great thinkers. By "crowd" I mean all his other IDs, which he refers to as "people". Idiocy he uses as the basis to deny that he is behind these IDs. He can't be "8 other people". Also, the comments don't match. As if it is 100% impossible for someone to write in another voice. For example, I hate Trump's guts, and it would therefore be impossible for me to create a sockpuppet who writes about how awesome Trump is.

Note that, aside from the first post ("Presidential Health") Luke (if he reads this) might claim that he did not author the posts in question. In fact, he might claim that I wrote them. A claim that I say is laughable. I mean, compare what I write here to the posts on "I'm Rooting For Trump" (the blog I pulled the other post titles from). The sentiments obviously do not match! I've never rooted for Trump. He did, by his own admission ("I'm rooting for Trump" being his EXACT words)!

Also, many of the posts contain lies about me. Why the hell would I write hateful lie-filled blog posts about myself? Luke is deeply mentally ill and someone I would not be surprised to hear about on the news as the next mass killer. At the very least we can be certain his claim that he follows the Golden Rule is complete bullshit.

He does not even know what the Golden Rule is! According to him "I treat you as you have treated me and you deserve it". But the ACTUAL Golden Rule says "one should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself".

Which, given the fact that he trolled me first and for years (during which time I could do nothing, because he only had the blog Stay A While, which he denies is his and is in any case abandoned), I took it that he wanted/wants me to troll Words and Music (and otherwise harass him when I see him commenting on other blogs such as WYD). Yet, when I did just that, he claimed he was the victim (he never trolled me, and certainly not as "Steve"), and whined (and continues to whine) about my reciprocal treatment of him. Treatment HE deserves.

SWTD #378

Sunday, April 30, 2017

Deplorables In The White House

...the republic is under siege by a moron, basically. The whole thing is tragic. Without overstating it, it's a tragedy for our democracy ~ Bruce Springsteen. From a Rolling Stone interview, 9/23/2017.

An image linked to from the blog Who's Your Daddy. Ted Nugent, Kid Rock and Sarah Palin in the White House makes me want to puke. Not to mention who is sitting in the Oval Office chair! (4/19/2017).

828X446

Can you believe that one of these people was almost our vice president? Scary to think that someone that dumb got that close to being president. I mean, if John McCain had died in office. And, if McCain had served 2 terms, she could would have run and be potus 45 right now.

Instead we got the male version of Sarah Palin. Intelligence-wise, I mean. Actually, he might be even dumber. Donald Trump is a moron. Born on 3rd base and he thinks he hit a homer. When you start out with hundreds of millions it makes it that much harder to fail. Although Trump knows how to game the system and make it appear as though he isn't a failed businessman.

I refer to his multiple bankruptcies. Something Trump is proud of; saying "I'm the king of debt". The United States can't file for bankruptcy, so this skill might turn out to be dangerous in a president. Of course many people would point out that the national debt increased under Barack Obama. But he did pull us out of a recession, and that was while being blocked by Republicans at every turn.

They blamed him for the bush recession and then for increasing the national debt to pay for a stimulus to avert a depression. Now that the Orange buffoon is in charge, a massive tax cut that will primarily benefit the wealthy and corporations seems probable. I mean, some kind of tax cut is probably going to happen, it's only a question of how budget-busting it is.

The Urban-Brookings Tax Center says "the cost of the cuts Mr. Trump proposed during the campaign at $6.2 trillion, assuming no additional growth, and just under $6 trillion when growth is factored in" (Economists Fear Trump's Tax Plan Only Heightens a Mountain of Debt).

Of course we know it will hurt the middle and lower classes, as Trump goes after the programs that benefits/helps these people in his ridiculous budget.

Apparently only Sarah Palin was originally invited and it was her idea to bring Ted and Kid. Palin says "Asked why I invited Kid Rock and Ted Nugent, I joked, Because Jesus was booked". Ha ha ha.

"I will never apologize for calling out evil people" Nuget said when asked if he regretted referring to President Obama as a "subhuman mongrel". Me, I don't think a man who threatened to kill President Obama should be allowed in the White House. It is Nugent who is evil.

800×462

Sarah Palin points and smirks at former 1st Lady HRC's portrait in the image above. Nugent gives a thumbs up, as if to say "you aren't president and I approve". Despite the fact that Palin was part of the ticket that ran for the White House and LOST. And Nugent saying he would die or go to jail if Barack Obama were elected to a 2nd term (due to him assassinating, or trying to assassinate President Barack Obama, I presume).

Kid Rock (AKA Robert Ritchie) worried (prior to Trump) that "Obummer" would ban guns. Of the 4 I'd say he's the one who offends me the least. Kid and Ted are non-politicians. Sarah is a failed politician. Donald is the one who is now in a position to do great damage to our country. And the most deplorable one (IMO) in the picture at the top of this post.

Yes, I want to see his agenda fail. Because his agenda will do great harm to our country. I'm not saying I want to see him impeached, because then we'd be stuck with either a president Pence (a huge homophobe) or president Ryan (an individual who hates poor people like his idol Ayn Rand).

But if the evidence shows Trump should be impeached or otherwise removed from office? Either because of collusion with Russia, violating the Constitution's emoluments clause, senility (and removal under Section 4 of the 25th Amendment), or for another reason? I say he should be ousted or forced to resign and let the chips fall where they may.

745×485

SWTD #377

Friday, April 14, 2017

Nobody Gives A Shit About The Chocolate Cake, You Moron!

With President Forrest Trump, every day is like a rancid box of chocolates. You never know what kind of shit you're going to get next ~ Stephen King on Twitter, 4/11/2017.

According to Trump, "we had the most beautiful piece of chocolate cake that you've ever seen" (him and Chinese President Xi), but I say he's full of shit. I have not and will never see this cake he says is "beautiful". Although I'd be more concerned about how it tastes than how it looks.

So Trump says to Maria Bartiromo (re what he told Xi) "we've just launched 59 missiles, heading to Iraq". Iraq? I'll assume he misspoke, but who knows? Maybe he thinks the missiles were going to Iraq instead of Syria.

Then Trump told a bigger lie. "Anybody that uses gases to do that to young children and babies, it's OK", the Orange sexual-assaluter-in-chief says was Chinese President Xi's response when he told him about the 59 Tomahawks. But that is how Trump feels! Or how he SAYS he feels. But I say he lied because I think he launched the missiles to sell the narrative that he didn't collude with Russia to steal the election (SWTD #374).

Selling this narrative is why his idiot son Eric said (following the strike) "If there was anything that Syria did, it was to validate the fact that there is no Russia tie". Bullshit. I'm not saying there is a Russia tie (although there surely does appear to be one, given all the advisors who communicated with Russian officials/are retroactively registering as foreign agents), only that this action doesn't "validate" that there isn't one.

Me, I think that Malcolm Nance's theory that the the Syria strike is a setup to justify lifting Russian sanctions is possible. Despite what some say concerning this theory being "dumbfuckery".

In the Chinese media, Xi is portrayed as the Adult in the room. And that the Chinese President standing up to the foolish Trump could "help elevate Mr. Xi's stature at home (What Chinese News Reports Tell Us About Beijing's View of Trump).

Also, "soon after the meeting ended, Chinese state media scolded Trump for his military action in Syria" (Trump-Xi meeting concluded without gaffe, but criticism soon followed). The STATE media! Proof that Xi did not agree with Trump. Perhaps he just said he did. Or Trump lied. I'm going with the later. He lied about Xi agreeing with him, just as he lied about the freaking chocolate cake!

Because he is a pathological liar. He cannot help himself but to lie about everything! BTW, CNN reports that Trump's Mar-a-Lago kitchen slapped with 13 health violations "including three categorized as high priority ... [which is a violation] which could contribute directly to a foodborne illness or injury and include items such as cooking, reheating, cooling and hand-washing".

Eat the cake and you could die. Via "illness causing bacteria on plates served in the dining room" (quote from 4/13/2017 airing of "All in with Chris Hayes" guest hosted by Joy Reid). Although probably not. Trump and Xi are both OK.

Unlike what would happen if TrumpCare is ever passed. Then we know for sure that people will die. Possibly an extra 50,000 people a year!

SWTD #376

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

PS Spicey Apologizes For Forgetting That Hitler Gassed Jews

You know that air freshener that just makes things worse? ~ Trevor Noah describing Sean Spicer's performance as WH Press Secretary on the 1/24/2017 airing of The Daily Show.

According to PS Spicey, "You had someone as despicable as Hitler who didn't even sink to using chemical weapons". This was in regards to a question about the Orange guy's illegal missile strike on Syria (pub 4/11/2017).

Snopes: ...although German troops may not have used chemical weapons on the battlefield, they were wielded with abandon against German citizens (and numerous others) in prison camps. According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Hitler's regime started using poisonous gases against Germans in 1939, with mental patients being the first people put to death through the use of carbon monoxide gas under a practice the Nazis referred to as "euthanasia".

Starting in December 1941, this method of killing expanded through the use of "gas vans" employing engine exhaust as well as carbon monoxide and crystalline hydrogen cyanide (aka Zyklon B) in concentration camps such as Auschwitz-Birkenau, Belzec, and Treblinka, among others.

Hitler did indeed use "gas on his own people the same way that Assad is [allegedly] doing" in the sense of employing it to kill innocent civilians; the only difference (to which Spicer was referring) was the delivery method: herding people into prison chambers to be gassed versus dropping gas bombs on them from the air.

PS Spicey later apologized for his forgetfulness, reminding me of the time Spicey said "I'd like to begin today by apologizing on behalf of you, to me. ... And that apology is not accepted".

The Anne Frank Center called (pre-apology) for Spicey to be fired. Their statement refers to Spicey's "evil spreading of the fake news that Hitler never used chemical weapons". Politicus USA notes that "The Trump White House has a history of trafficking in dog whistle Holocaust denial".

The history of the Trump White House dog whistling to the Bannon-types includes the following.

On Holocaust Remembrance Day, for example, the White House issued a statement that did not mention the Jewish people, an erasure that is also a common tactic of Holocaust deniers. The statement was met with celebration on anti-Semitic websites.

"This is the first time in history the President of the United States has made no mention of Jews, anti-Semitism, or the science fiction Zionist folklore about ovens and gas chambers so prominent in (((Hollywood))) narratives", the Daily Stormer... wrote. The three parentheses around "Hollywood" are a white supremacist designation for people or institutions they consider to be Jewish. ...

After Spicer's statement, the Daily Stormer rejoiced even more, and took it as a confirmation that the statement had been an intentional veiled nod. "We previously reported that the White House released a statement on holohoax remembrance day that failed to mention Jews or anti-Semitism. This was in no way accidental, but all in all it was basically a subtle nod to us"... (The Trump team's history of flirting with Holocaust deniers by Laurel Raymond. ThinkProgress, 4/11/2017).

So... were Spicey's statements (which occurred during the Jewish holiday of Passover) "a series of verbal bungles — stupid, maybe, but not intentionally malevolent", or were they intentional? The racists say intentional. Me, I'm not sure. It's a hell of a coincidence if that is what it is. Given the fact that Trump's "chief strategist" Steve Bannon is an actual White Nationalist and the Trump campaign actively courted the White racist vote.

President Trump's been playing a double game with all things Jewish. He professes to be pro-Israel, but gained the alt-right following that helped him to power by repeatedly retweeting anti-Semitic and other racist propaganda. In one week in January 2016, 62% of his tweets had white nationalist origins or connections. (Sean Spicer's Holocaust remark is a symptom of Trump's problem by Ruth Ben-Ghiat. CNN 4/12/2017)

Hmmm... "a symptom of Trump's problem" or a manifestation of his strategy? I say strategy, strategized by Trump's chief strategist, the White Nationalist anti semite Steve Bannon. Which makes sense, given the fact (as I've pointed out on this blog multiple times) Donald Trump is a racist and a bigot (SWTD #347).

I don't know about Sean Spicer. He may just be another who sold out (like Kellyanne Conway) and jumped on the Trump train (after previously criticizing Trump). I do know that he's got no problem representing and speaking on behalf of a bigoted and racist administration.

Image: White Nationalists and Neo-Nazis use Sean Spicer's Hitler comments to validate Holocaust conspiracy theories, attack Jews (Media Matters, 4/12/2017).

See Also: [RNUSA] Spicer And His Hitler – Assad Comparison, 4/11/2017.

SWTD #375

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Trump Wags The Dog Re Illegal Syria Missile Strike

If... you believe the missile attack proves there is no connection between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, you could have easily thought, before the missile strike, that the missile strike would prove that. And then decide to do the missile strike, so that you could say exactly that ~ Lawrence O'Donnell, The Last Word 4/11/2017.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer recently said the following regarding our (Trump's) ally Russia.

"...we can work with allies, including Russia" according to #Spicey. So, Russia is an "ally" (in regards to what should be done concerning the Khan Shaykhun chemical attack in Syria)? This from Spicey when his boss is being investigated by the FBI in regards to possible coordination between Candidate Cheto and Putin regarding his "influence campaign". A Freudian slip or an outright admission that Spicey's boss is buddy-buddy with Pooty Poot due to Pooty helping him "win" the election?

Obviously Spicey's answer (in response to a reporter asking if Trump is concerned with the Syrian people, does that mean his position re accepting refugees has changed) is pure bullshit. Remember that (during the campaign) Candidate Cheeto said, in regards to Syrian childern, "I can look in their faces and aay you can't come".

We're supposed to believe that this airstrike was based on Trump being broken up about dead Syrian kids? When he was concerned about their parents being terrorists? "No child of God should ever suffer such horror" was the bullshit line he used to explain his illegal action [1]. An action (lobing 70 million worth of missiles at the Assad airbase from which the chemical weapon attack was supposedly launched) that he informed Russia about beforehand [2].

Secretary of State getting Russian sanctions so Exxon can make a lot of money drilling Russian oil Rex Tillerson said "Russia had failed to carry out a 2013 agreement to secure Syrian chemical weapons [and] that Moscow was either complicit or incompetent in its ability to uphold that deal"... yet he informs Russia of the upcoming strikes so Pooty can tell Assad to move the chemical weapons?

I'v got to wonder if the military under Trump "taking action and deescalating what's going on in Syria" (according to PS Spicey) an outright lie or just evidence of how incompetent this (illegitimate) president is? I mean, planes were taking off the next day from the targeted Assad airbase. 59 Tomahawks (costing 1-1.4 million each) apparently were ineffective in stopping business as usual (more airstrikes by Syrian planes on Syrian citizens) for even a full day?

Observers had reported the base had been badly destroyed by the 1,000lb warheads and that several planes and a runway had been put out of service. However it is thought that an advance warning given by the US to Russia allowed Syria enough time to remove many of its aircraft before the raid. (The Telegraph, 4/8/2017).

My opinion is that this (Trump's concern over dead babies/Spicey's BS about the attack "deescalating" SQUAT) is nought but an attempt to wag the dog. Except here the Orange Administration is trying to distract from the Trump Russian connections (as opposed to a sex scandal, i.e. Bill Clinton supposedly distracting from his indiscretion with Monica Lewinsky by going after Bin Laden).

"To our very foolish leader, do not attack Syria – if you do many very bad things will happen & from that fight the U.S. gets nothing!" the hypocrite-in-chief tweeted back when a Black guy was president. This time, the US still gets nothing, but Trump gets to "disprove" any connection to Russia. "If there was anything that Syria did, it was to validate the fact that there is no Russia tie" Eric Trump recently asserted. Wag, wag.

So obvious, yet the media fawns, Congressional Republicans approve (despite declining to act when the Black president said Congress should hold a vote, and the public is duped. As per a recent CBS News poll "57 percent of Americans approve of the strike".

Wag success? Apparently when it comes to some of the Trump dupes. "Finally a president with courage and resolve to fight ISIS and the Moslems [sic]. President Trump said we'd start winning and we have! Thank you and God Bless President Trump" one such dupe wrote recently (on the WYD blog, an online forum where #trumpdupes gather).

Although some Tump enthusiasts are angry about this 180 (Some of Trump's biggest supporters are furious about his strikes in Syria). "I guess Trump wasn't Putin's puppet after all, he was just another deep state/Neo-Con puppet" Infowars contributor Paul Joseph Watson tweeted.

What an idiot. Wagged and duped. In that he buys the Eric Trump meme that the attack "proves" Trump is no Putin Puppet, but didn't have any clue beforehand that Trump is a pathological liar ("working to undermine US democracy" according to Senator Bernie Sanders. The goal being to move us farther along the road to another form of government. As his cabinet of oligarchs proves, IMO).

Previously (when it was Obama considering what to do re Syria and chemical weapons) I thought that intervening for humanitarian reasons was a reason for US action. Although, when a deal was negotiated for the UN (who "sent in inspectors to carry out the removal and destruction of Syria's arsenal") to oversee the process (Resolution 2118) I thought the issue was (successfully) dealt with. And with no military action (necessary?) by the Obama Administration.

Wikipedia notes that "the actual destruction operations, performed by a team of U.S. Army civilians and contractors, destroyed 600 metric tons of chemical agents in 42 days [and] On 6/23/2014, the last declared chemical weapons were shipped out of Syria for destruction".

So WTF happened? Re Wikipedia, "to avoid a military intervention, the United States, Russia and Syria agreed to the Framework for Elimination of Syrian Chemical Weapons". Obviously Obama was duped by Putin and Assad. And Trump is enforcing the "red line" the pussy Obama backed away from. But that's what happens when you replace a (secret Muslim) president with a decisive White Male Christian. Or so goes the narrative among the brainwashed dupes.

The truth may be that Syria retained some of it's chemical weapons (chlorine and ricin as per Wikipedia) or that this is another frame job and it was really the (not-at-all) Moderate rebels who are responsible. As they were re the Ghouta chemical attack of 8/21/2013. If you think Seymour Hersh, who wrote (in December of 2013) that "al-Nusra Front [AKA the Moderate rebels]... had mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity [and that] al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the [Obama] administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad".

Me, I don't know. But I do believe that Trump needed to get Congressional approval to conduct military actions against Assad. Which Obama attempted (and was denied) and Trump did not attempt (and therefore his action was illegal). And I am convinced that his action was NOT because he believes that "no child of God should ever suffer such horror". That I do not buy for one second.

BTW, those 59 Tomahawk missiles are manufactured by Raytheon, "the world's largest producer of guided missiles". A company Trump (reportedly) owns stock in! Stock that increased in value following our use of Raytheon product (Marketwatch reports Ratheon "up 0.8%, after jumping more than 3%"). Other defense industry stocks rose as well (along with the per barrel oil price, "up some 2%").

Although Trump may have forgotten that he owns Raytheon, given that he turned his business over to his two sons (a not-at-all blind trust). Ugh. #crookeddonald, #SyrianStrikes, #wagthedog.

Video: Rocky Mountain Mike's "When The Black Guy Did It", a parody of a Don Henly tune that asks why, when Obama was prez and sought to do something about Syria, the Republican Congress voted no. Not that I think they should have said yes. I'm just pointing out that they're cowards who don't want to take a vote they could be held accountable for (therefore if Trump just does it, legality or illegality is not something they give a shit about). Also, this was part of their plan to paint Obama as weak on foreign policy/American military might. See Obama's supposed "apology tour", "leading from behind", him lacking the "courage" to fight ISIS (as per the WYD dupe previously quoted), etc.

Footnotes
[1] The missile strike was illegal under the War Powers Resolution. If Trump had struck the rebels, I think the administration could argue that was legal, since they are affiliated with al Qaeda and the AUMF that was passed under bush is technically still in effect (the one that gives the potus the power to go after "the terrorists"). But he struck a base belonging to the Syrian government. Not that I expect that Congress will hold Trump accountable. Presidents, history has shown, usually get away with such things. That does not change the fact that the strike was illegal under United States law. The troll Luke, who wrote on his blog "Trump's missile attack was not illegal, but I wouldn't expect a delusional liar like Dervish Trump to know that", is WRONG.
[2] The Tomahawk missiles used cost 1-1.4 million each, while replacing them will cost approximately 70 million. (Source).

SWTD #374

Sunday, March 26, 2017

My Message From A Damned Ayn Rand, Delivered After She Emerged Burning From The Lake Of Fire

Don't you understand that when this life is finished, you're not there to say "Oh how terrible that I'm a corpse". What I've always thought is a sentence from a Greek philosopher, I don't remember, unfortunately, who it was, that I read at 16, and it's affected me all my life. "I will not die. It's the world that will end" ~ Ayn Rand, appearing on the 7/2/1979 broadcast of Tomorrow with Tom Snyder.

You would be shocked by the identity of the individual from whom the next message I received came. If I had not revealed who it was in the title of this post, that is. Yes, it was (the deceased) Ayn Rand. The woman who founded the evil ideology known as Objectivism. So evil that it inspired the founder of the Church of Satan, Anton LeVay, who modeled his religion on it.

This message was delivered after Mrs. Rand emerged, burning, from the Lake of Fire. As per Wikipedia "in both ancient Egyptian and Christian religion, the Lake of Fire is as a place of after-death destruction of the wicked". Given that she was a truly evil woman, it was not a surprise, upon reflection, that Ayn Rand ended up there.

I was still seated at the far end of a 60 foot table, set with a rotting banquet. My host, a "Mr. Charles" (AKA the Lord of the Land of Nightmares) waved his hand, and, as if beckoned, a figure emerged from the Lake of Fire several yards behind us (a tributary of it, actually, given the fact that I was not in hell, but in the Land of Nightmares, but I digress).

The figure approached, aflame and screaming in agony. With another wave of his hand, the flames were suddenly extinguished. An ancient (but surprisingly unburnt, although completely nude) Ayn Rand pulled out a chair opposite me and took a seat.

"I desperately need a cigarette Frederick" the woman said in a Russian accent. Frederick produced a pack from inside his cloak, lit one, and placed it in the quivering hand of the jonesing nicotine addict. "This tastes so good" Rand remarked after taking a long drag. "To bad smoking is what killed you" Charles replied. "That's a load of horse manure" Rand protested. "There is zero conclusive, nonstatistical proof that smoking causes cancer".

"Yes, of course" Charles remarked sarcastically. "I think you might know who this is" Charles said, turning his head to look at me. Rand's eyes met mine, then she said "I have heard that you write nasty things about me. Things that are untrue. I do not hate poor people at all. If I were still alive I would sue you for libel, you cretinous scumbag".

The elderly Mrs Rand shook with rage as she continued. "Poor people hate themselves. They would not choose poverty is they had any respect for themselves. The poor are the lowest forms of life in existence and should be exterminated".

A few moments of silence passed. "Isn't there one other thing you wanted to tell Mr. Sanders" Charles finally said. "A reprieve from Hell for a damned soul is not something that is easily obtained". Rand, who had been silently smoking, drawing long, deep inhalations from her cigarette glanced at Charles, snuffed out her smoke in the carcass of a rotting turkey, then spoke.

"I would leap across the table and strangle this pissant to death right now if I possessed the strength" Rand hissed as she stared at me with a look of pure hate plastered on her face. "Calm yourself, Ayn", Mr. Charles remarked, looking slightly annoyed. "I am calm" Rand objected. "I'm just saying that it would bring me great pleasure to see the light go from his eyes as I choked the life out of him".

"I would be more than happy to let you do it" Charles replied. "But Dervish has protectors in high places, unfortunately". At first I was a little shaken by the fury of the angry Rand, but now I laughed. Although, remembering where I was, I stifled it and all that emerged was a single "ha". "What's that!" the Objectivist founder roared. "How dare you!". This time she did leap to her feet, but Charles blocked her with his hand.

His hand on her chest, Charles gave one of Rand's old sagging titties a squeeze, then he reached down and grabbed her by the privates. "I call this move the Trump" Charles said.

"This Trump obviously knows what women like" Rand purred, grinding her decrepit nether region against Charles' hand. If I had eaten anything recently the display would certainly have caused me to lose my lunch. It surely was a nightmare to behold.

Seeking to interrupt the two, I blurted "I guess the world didn't end on 3/6/1982, despite your belief that it would". "Very funny" Rand replied, taking a seat.

"I admit the world did not end as I thought it would. No matter. From what I hear this Trump will soon be your president. Although I hear he is elected over a woman. Obviously a dyke, as a woman should not want to be president".

"I also hear that the Trump has promised to do away with subsidies for poor maggots to obtain health care [1]. The perverse morality of altruism is the LAST thing America needs. Although Charles says a socialist dystopia is only to be averted thanks to the intervention of the Dark One".

"The Dark One? I thought you were an atheist" I replied. "There is no better cure for atheism than death" Charles chuckled softly. "Now I am done with you Dervish. Begone. And YOU", Charles said, turning to Rand. "It is time for you to live up to your claim of being an expert sword swallower". Charles rose and began tugging at a length of rope around his waist. Once removed his pants fell to the ground, revealing a burned and shriveled member.

Gagging, I looked away. "Jealous?" Charles inquired. "Now get the hell out of here. My imp will show you to the exit". I looked around and saw the devilkin motioning me to follow him. Eager to leave, I walked quickly in the direction indicated, the intense heat causing my legs to feel rubbery. I heard some sucking noises and moans of pleasure as I quickened my pace, not looking back.

Another message from another individual was delivered before I finally made it back home, but that is another tale for another time. One that will be related on this blog in due course. Also (as previously mentioned) it was quite some time before the memory of what happened during my travels in the Land of Nightmares came back to me. When I finally returned home I fell into a deep sleep and, upon awaking, retained no memory at all of the messages Charles and Rand relayed to me. Not until recently, that is.

Image: Ayn Rand burns in Hell.

Footnote
[1] "The House Republican bill [the American Health Care Act] would roll back the expansion of Medicaid that has provided coverage to more than 10 million people in 31 states... [also eliminated would be the] income-based tax credits that help millions of Americans buy insurance"... (Republicans Introduce Obamacare Replacement That Leaves Much To Be Desired).

SWTD #373, MES #6.